![]() This was a mirror of my entire D: drive.ĭo you run SBF as the last job at night and then have it automatically shutdown your PC? If so, how do you do that? I tried creating a Win10 task using Task Scheduler with an argument of " -Shutdown" per a post I read but that task did not work. Ran SBF and it took 3 min, 11 seconds to complete the mirror to the E: drive. ![]() I edited 2 files and deleted one obsolete file on the D: drive. Then I did a restart to insure that there was nothing being cached to increase speed. SBF took about 2.5 hours to copy 832GB from my internal SATA D: drive to my internal SATA E: drive. There is no free version so it has to be purchased, though there is a free trial period.Īs previously mentioned, I installed SyncBackFree (SBF) to see how it works. I sent some questions to their contact us link and hope to get a response after this weekend. It's author says it is similar to rsync except "Bvckup 2 doesn't require a second instance of itself to be running on the receiving end, meaning that its delta copying can be used with any storage facility that provides basic write access." Bvckup 2 is said to be super fast (by author and users) because of its "Delta copying" that only writes changed blocks in a file and not the entire file. I never heard of Bvckup 2 before either until my current research. What you asked for, Enterprises call real-time backup or CDP (continuous data protection) and charge a lot of money for it.īvkup2 has been around a long time, but I had never heard of it. One corrupt incremental bkup voids all successive incremental backups.Īs Billiam29 mentioned above, RAID-1 might work for you.Īnother idea is Acrosync, which is a Windows implementation of rsync, an excellent open source program. I've never been inclined to use incremental backups since the last one depends on all previous ones being perfect. I think it's bad because she must leave her laptop running all night so as not to miss the schedule. My wife uses paid Macrium for incremental backups on a schedule. Yes, that is part of the more stringent hardware requirements of RAID 1. I read that even using motherboard RAID 1 is still actually a software solution and to get the true benefits of RAID 1 with no impact on running application software, one must purchase a dedicated RAID card that handles stuff in hardware. Yes, I did research using RAID 1 but the more stringent hardware requirements were a bit more than I felt comfortable with. This could be an explicit requirement or a "you really should to play it safe" requirement. ![]() The possible downside is that some RAID solutions may need identical hard drives. Routine "data integrity" backups to protect against infections, user errors, and so forth to be performed in addition to the RAID arrangement. Near real-time mirroring for the purpose of protecting against disk failure. I'm quite surprised nobody has said this yet, but your description is pretty much exactly what RAID 1 is for. This backup would only be for drive failure protection and not for protection against infections or user errors. My D: drive is an internal HDD and I would be backing it up (mirroring) it to another internal HDD. User comments say that it is super fast and super reliable with a minimalist design. Now after some research, I'm thinking about making real-time backups of my D: data drive using a backup program called Bvckup 2. Those backups are my data protection backups. I periodically make image backups of my D: data drive using Macrium Reflect Free.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |